Brazil vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)

Brazil
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Small island developing States (SIDS)
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Brazil rank
2nd
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
1st

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time

  • Brazil
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
-40-2002040199120082025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.

Brazil ranks 2nd and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 1st of 161 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Small island developing States (SIDS) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0.0713 % change on previous year 0.0713 % change on previous year Small island developing States (SIDS)
2000s -3.01 % change on previous year 1.91 % change on previous year 4.92 % change on previous year Small island developing States (SIDS)
2010s -2.79 % change on previous year 5.59 % change on previous year 8.38 % change on previous year Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s 4.16 % change on previous year -4.1 % change on previous year 8.26 % change on previous year Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Brazil or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Brazil, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2025.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Brazil and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
0 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
Brazil ranks 2nd and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 1st of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/brazil/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/brazil/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Brazil vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 5,353 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.