How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Nepal?

5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

British Virgin Islands vs Nepal: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)

British Virgin Islands

-100 % change on previous year

in 2016

Nepal

-100 % change on previous year

in 2021

British Virgin Islands rank

106th

Nepal rank

106th

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time

British Virgin Islands
Nepal

How they compare

British Virgin Islands currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

British Virgin Islands ranks 106th and Nepal ranks 106th of 161 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), British Virgin Islands or Nepal?: British Virgin Islands, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2016.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between British Virgin Islands and Nepal?: 0 % change on previous year, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Nepal?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
How do British Virgin Islands and Nepal rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?: British Virgin Islands ranks 106th and Nepal ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs Nepal: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/british-virgin-islands/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/british-virgin-islands/nepal/">British Virgin Islands vs Nepal: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 193 places, 5,353 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.