Eastern Africa vs Sweden: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Eastern Africa
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Sweden
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Eastern Africa rank
1st
Sweden rank
2nd
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Eastern Africa
- Sweden
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eastern Africa averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | -0.3434 % change on previous year | -1.7 % change on previous year | 1.36 % change on previous year | Eastern Africa |
| 2010s | -0.1272 % change on previous year | 3.62 % change on previous year | 3.75 % change on previous year | Sweden |
| 2020s | -2.43 % change on previous year | -0.7278 % change on previous year | 1.7 % change on previous year | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Eastern Africa or Sweden?
- Eastern Africa, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Eastern Africa and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Eastern Africa and Sweden rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Eastern Africa ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.