Kenya vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Kenya
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Kenya rank
106th
Latvia rank
106th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Kenya
- Latvia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 106th and Latvia ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Kenya or Latvia?
- Kenya, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Kenya and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
- How do Kenya and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Kenya ranks 106th and Latvia ranks 106th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.