Latvia vs Nepal: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Nepal
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Latvia rank
106th
Nepal rank
106th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Latvia
- Nepal
How they compare
Latvia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 106th and Nepal ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.76 % change on previous year | 11.67 % change on previous year | 6.91 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 2020s | -50 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Latvia or Nepal?
- Latvia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Latvia and Nepal?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Latvia ranks 106th and Nepal ranks 106th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.