Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Papua New Guinea: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | 0.1317 % change on previous year | 0.0018 % change on previous year | 0.1299 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | -0.731 % change on previous year | 29.9 % change on previous year | 30.63 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | -3.03 % change on previous year | -13.11 % change on previous year | 10.08 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Papua New Guinea?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.