Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Uganda
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
1st
Uganda rank
2nd
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Uganda
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Uganda, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Uganda ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | 0.1317 % change on previous year | -5.18 % change on previous year | 5.32 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | -0.731 % change on previous year | -3.68 % change on previous year | 2.95 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | -3.03 % change on previous year | -3.37 % change on previous year | 0.3402 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uganda?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.