Sao Tome and Principe vs United States Virgin Islands: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)

Sao Tome and Principe
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
United States Virgin Islands
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe rank
106th
United States Virgin Islands rank
106th

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • United States Virgin Islands
-100-75-50-250199120032016

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United States Virgin Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was United States Virgin Islands ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 106th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 106th of 161 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2000s 0.1885 % change on previous year -2.35 % change on previous year 2.54 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Sao Tome and Principe or United States Virgin Islands?
Sao Tome and Principe, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United States Virgin Islands as of 2016.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Sao Tome and Principe and United States Virgin Islands?
0 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and United States Virgin Islands?
20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 106th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs United States Virgin Islands: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/sao-tome-and-principe/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/sao-tome-and-principe/virgin-islands-u-s/">Sao Tome and Principe vs United States Virgin Islands: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 5,353 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.