China vs Cuba: Net Forest conversion: Net emissions/removals (CO2) … Net capita
China
0 kt per person
in 2025
Cuba
0 kt per person
in 2025
China rank
87th
Cuba rank
87th
Net Forest conversion: Net emissions/removals (CO2) … Net capita over time
- China
- Cuba
How they compare
China currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
China ranks 87th and Cuba ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), China or Cuba?
- China, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between China and Cuba?
- 0 kt per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Cuba?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do China and Cuba rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- China ranks 87th and Cuba ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.