Latvia vs South Sudan: Net Forest conversion: Net emissions/removals (CO2) … Net capita
Latvia
0 kt per person
in 2025
South Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2025
Latvia rank
87th
South Sudan rank
87th
Net Forest conversion: Net emissions/removals (CO2) … Net capita over time
- Latvia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0023 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0.0023 kt per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0.0005 kt per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Latvia or South Sudan?
- Latvia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Latvia and South Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and South Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Latvia ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.