China vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion: Net emissions/removals (CO2) … Net square

China
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
87th
Latvia rank
87th

Net Forest conversion: Net emissions/removals (CO2) … Net square over time

  • China
  • Latvia
00.020.040.060.08199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

China ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 87th of 191 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre —
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre —
2010s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0654 kt per square kilometre 0.0651 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0214 kt per square kilometre 0.0213 kt per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), China or Latvia?
China, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between China and Latvia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
China ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-per-square-kilometre/china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-per-square-kilometre/china/latvia/">China vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,341 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.