Belarus vs Japan: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Belarus
3,550 kt
in 2022
Japan
2,251 kt
in 2022
Belarus rank
16th
Japan rank
19th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Belarus
- Japan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 3,550 kt against 2,251 kt in Japan, a difference of 1,299 kt.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Belarus ranks 16th and Japan ranks 19th of 59 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,243 kt | 6,765 kt | 4,522 kt | Japan |
| 2000s | 2,169 kt | 4,081 kt | 1,912 kt | Japan |
| 2010s | 2,534 kt | 2,974 kt | 440.86 kt | Japan |
| 2020s | 3,298 kt | 2,507 kt | 791.18 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Belarus or Japan?
- Belarus, at 3,550 kt against 2,251 kt in Japan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Belarus and Japan?
- 1,299 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Japan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
- How do Belarus and Japan rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Belarus ranks 16th and Japan ranks 19th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).