Belarus vs Sweden: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Belarus
3,550 kt
in 2022
Sweden
2,950 kt
in 2022
Belarus rank
16th
Sweden rank
17th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Belarus
- Sweden
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 3,550 kt against 2,950 kt in Sweden, a difference of 600 kt.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 16th and Sweden ranks 17th of 59 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,243 kt | 2,256 kt | 13.76 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 2,169 kt | 2,388 kt | 219.11 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 2,534 kt | 2,950 kt | 416.6 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 3,298 kt | 2,739 kt | 559.71 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Belarus or Sweden?
- Belarus, at 3,550 kt against 2,950 kt in Sweden as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Belarus and Sweden?
- 600 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
- How do Belarus and Sweden rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Belarus ranks 16th and Sweden ranks 17th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).