Belarus vs Serbia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Belarus
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
19th
Serbia rank
16th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Belarus
  • Serbia
00000199220072023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Belarus ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 16th of 176 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Belarus or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Belarus and Serbia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Serbia rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Belarus ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 16th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Serbia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/belarus/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/belarus/serbia/">Belarus vs Serbia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.