Chile vs Ecuador: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Chile
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
90th
Ecuador rank
89th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Chile
  • Ecuador
0000196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 90th and Ecuador ranks 89th of 176 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Chile or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Chile and Ecuador?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Chile ranks 90th and Ecuador ranks 89th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.