Costa Rica vs Malta: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Costa Rica
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
29th
Malta rank
28th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Malta
0000196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 29th and Malta ranks 28th of 176 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Costa Rica or Malta?
Malta, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Costa Rica and Malta?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Malta rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Costa Rica ranks 29th and Malta ranks 28th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Malta: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/costa-rica/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/costa-rica/malta/">Costa Rica vs Malta: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.