Eswatini vs Sweden: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Eswatini
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
79th
Sweden rank
78th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sweden
00000196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 78th of 176 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Eswatini or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Eswatini and Sweden?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sweden rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Eswatini ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 78th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sweden: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/eswatini/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/eswatini/sweden/">Eswatini vs Sweden: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.