Mexico vs Rwanda: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Mexico
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
60th
Rwanda rank
62nd

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Mexico
  • Rwanda
000000196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 176 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Mexico or Rwanda?
Mexico, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Mexico and Rwanda?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Mexico ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Rwanda: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/mexico/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers-4/mexico/rwanda/">Mexico vs Rwanda: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.