Australia vs Botswana: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied

Australia
11.86 % change on previous year
in 2023
Botswana
10.36 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia rank
64th
Botswana rank
66th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied over time

  • Australia
  • Botswana
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 11.86 % change on previous year against 10.36 % change on previous year in Botswana, a difference of 1.5 % change on previous year.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 64th and Botswana ranks 66th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Botswana in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Botswana Difference Ahead
1960s 19.68 % change on previous year 6.04 % change on previous year 13.64 % change on previous year Australia
1970s 7.87 % change on previous year -3.81 % change on previous year 11.68 % change on previous year Australia
1980s 6.23 % change on previous year 1.24 % change on previous year 5 % change on previous year Australia
1990s 9.65 % change on previous year 46.06 % change on previous year 36.41 % change on previous year Botswana
2000s -1.69 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 1.69 % change on previous year Botswana
2010s 4.99 % change on previous year 11.02 % change on previous year 6.03 % change on previous year Botswana
2020s 13.57 % change on previous year 16.06 % change on previous year 2.49 % change on previous year Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied, Australia or Botswana?
Australia, at 11.86 % change on previous year against 10.36 % change on previous year in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied between Australia and Botswana?
1.5 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Botswana?
54 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Australia and Botswana rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied?
Australia ranks 64th and Botswana ranks 66th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Botswana: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-nitrogen-fertilizer-content-applied-that-leaches-annual-growth/australia/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-nitrogen-fertilizer-content-applied-that-leaches-annual-growth/australia/botswana/">Australia vs Botswana: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,629 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.