Melanesia vs New Zealand: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied

Melanesia
-11.28 % change on previous year
in 2023
New Zealand
-12.14 % change on previous year
in 2023
Melanesia rank
176th
New Zealand rank
177th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied over time

  • Melanesia
  • New Zealand
0100200196219922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports -11.28 % change on previous year against -12.14 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0.86 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Melanesia ahead.

Melanesia ranks 176th and New Zealand ranks 177th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 23.72 % change on previous year 14.62 % change on previous year 9.1 % change on previous year Melanesia
1970s 11.67 % change on previous year 25 % change on previous year 13.33 % change on previous year New Zealand
1980s 4.91 % change on previous year 3.22 % change on previous year 1.69 % change on previous year Melanesia
1990s -6.39 % change on previous year 26.38 % change on previous year 32.77 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 14.21 % change on previous year 5.77 % change on previous year 8.45 % change on previous year Melanesia
2010s 5.52 % change on previous year 4.4 % change on previous year 1.12 % change on previous year Melanesia
2020s -1.73 % change on previous year -4.77 % change on previous year 3.04 % change on previous year Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied, Melanesia or New Zealand?
Melanesia, at -11.28 % change on previous year against -12.14 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied between Melanesia and New Zealand?
0.86 % change on previous year, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and New Zealand?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and New Zealand rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied?
Melanesia ranks 176th and New Zealand ranks 177th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs New Zealand: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-nitrogen-fertilizer-content-applied-that-leaches-annual-growth/melanesia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-nitrogen-fertilizer-content-applied-that-leaches-annual-growth/melanesia/new-zealand/">Melanesia vs New Zealand: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,629 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.