Sierra Leone vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied

Sierra Leone
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sierra Leone rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
95th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Sri Lanka
0200400600196219922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 343.89 % change on previous year 4.27 % change on previous year 339.62 % change on previous year Sierra Leone
1970s 17.04 % change on previous year 6.11 % change on previous year 10.93 % change on previous year Sierra Leone
1980s 51.58 % change on previous year 3.9 % change on previous year 47.68 % change on previous year Sierra Leone
1990s 0.8571 % change on previous year 4.62 % change on previous year 3.76 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2000s 52.06 % change on previous year 0.1592 % change on previous year 51.9 % change on previous year Sierra Leone
2010s 78.51 % change on previous year 6.1 % change on previous year 72.41 % change on previous year Sierra Leone
2020s 0 % change on previous year 4.09 % change on previous year 4.09 % change on previous year Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied, Sierra Leone or Sri Lanka?
Sierra Leone, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied between Sierra Leone and Sri Lanka?
0 % change on previous year, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Sri Lanka?
56 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Sierra Leone and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied?
Sierra Leone ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-nitrogen-fertilizer-content-applied-that-leaches-annual-growth/sierra-leone/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-nitrogen-fertilizer-content-applied-that-leaches-annual-growth/sierra-leone/sri-lanka/">Sierra Leone vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,629 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.