Tonga vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied

Tonga
15.39 % change on previous year
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
13.62 % change on previous year
in 2023
Tonga rank
54th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
56th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied over time

  • Tonga
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-2000200400600196219922023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 15.39 % change on previous year against 13.62 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.77 % change on previous year.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Tonga ahead.

Tonga ranks 54th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 56th of 215 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tonga averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tonga United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1980s -11.8 % change on previous year 7.45 % change on previous year 19.26 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 0 % change on previous year 54.15 % change on previous year 54.15 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 63.17 % change on previous year 7.26 % change on previous year 55.91 % change on previous year Tonga
2020s -2.62 % change on previous year 42.73 % change on previous year 45.35 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied, Tonga or United Republic of Tanzania?
Tonga, at 15.39 % change on previous year against 13.62 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied between Tonga and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.77 % change on previous year, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and United Republic of Tanzania?
19 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Tonga and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — nitrogen fertilizer content applied?
Tonga ranks 54th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 56th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tonga vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-nitrogen-fertilizer-content-applied-that-leaches-annual-growth/tonga/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-nitrogen-fertilizer-content-applied-that-leaches-annual-growth/tonga/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Tonga vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,629 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Nitrogen fertilizer content applied that leaches. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.