Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Italy: On-farm energy use — Emissions
On-farm energy use — Emissions over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 8.45 kt against 0.0192 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 8.43 kt.
That makes Italy's figure about 440.0 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 16th and Italy ranks 16th of 18 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher on-farm energy use — emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Italy?
- Italy, at 8.45 kt against 0.0192 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in on-farm energy use — emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Italy?
- 8.43 kt, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Italy?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Italy rank globally for on-farm energy use — emissions?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 16th and Italy ranks 16th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as On-farm energy use — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf