Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Belarus
228.78 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
387.96 kt
in 2023
Belarus rank
26th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
25th

On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2004006008001.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 387.96 kt against 228.78 kt in Belarus, a difference of 159.18 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.7 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 26th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 25th of 169 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 222.19 kt 430.8 kt 208.61 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 206.5 kt 769.28 kt 562.78 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 207.54 kt 557.22 kt 349.68 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 222.69 kt 412 kt 189.31 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 387.96 kt against 228.78 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
159.18 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Belarus ranks 26th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 25th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/on-farm-energy-use-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/on-farm-energy-use-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
218 places, 6,884 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf