Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Republic of Moldova: On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
90.76 kt
in 2023
Republic of Moldova
42.32 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
7th
Republic of Moldova rank
9th

On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Republic of Moldova
020406080100199020062023

How they compare

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports 90.76 kt against 42.32 kt in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 48.44 kt.

That makes Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s figure about 2.1 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 9th of 18 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 3 and Republic of Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 3.67 kt 55.29 kt 51.62 kt Republic of Moldova
2000s 75.59 kt 20.13 kt 55.46 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s 65.81 kt 23.09 kt 42.72 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2020s 80.53 kt 40.92 kt 39.62 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Republic of Moldova?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at 90.76 kt against 42.32 kt in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Republic of Moldova?
48.44 kt, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Republic of Moldova?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Republic of Moldova rank globally for on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 9th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Republic of Moldova: On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/on-farm-energy-use-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/on-farm-energy-use-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/republic-of-moldova/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Republic of Moldova: On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
218 places, 6,884 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf