Latvia vs Nicaragua: Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Nicaragua
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Latvia rank
44th
Nicaragua rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Latvia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Latvia ranks 44th and Nicaragua ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Latvia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nicaragua as of 2000.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 44th and Nicaragua ranks 44th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.