New Zealand vs Polynesia: Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Polynesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
New Zealand rank
44th
Polynesia rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- New Zealand
- Polynesia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Polynesia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Polynesia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 44th and Polynesia ranks 44th of 151 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, New Zealand or Polynesia?
- New Zealand, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Polynesia as of 2000.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between New Zealand and Polynesia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Polynesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do New Zealand and Polynesia rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- New Zealand ranks 44th and Polynesia ranks 44th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.