Sri Lanka vs Uganda: Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Uganda
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Sri Lanka rank
44th
Uganda rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uganda
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uganda, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 44th and Uganda ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -16.67 % change on previous year | 2.86 % change on previous year | 19.53 % change on previous year | Uganda |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -6.56 % change on previous year | 93.44 % change on previous year | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Sri Lanka or Uganda?
- Sri Lanka, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uganda as of 2000.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Sri Lanka and Uganda?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uganda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uganda rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Sri Lanka ranks 44th and Uganda ranks 44th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.