Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Open shrubland — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
11.72 million ha
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
109,579 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
3rd

Open shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
020.0M40.0M60.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 11.72 million ha against 109,579 ha in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 11.61 million ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 106.9 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 218 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 19.36 million ha 1.86 million ha 17.51 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 21.48 million ha 647,548 ha 20.83 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 20.31 million ha 139,376 ha 20.17 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 14.56 million ha 86,322 ha 14.48 million ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 11.72 million ha against 109,579 ha in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
11.61 million ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Open shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Open shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.