Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Open shrubland — Burned Area
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0 ha
in 2024
China
0 ha
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
44th
China rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- China
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in China, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 44th and China ranks 44th of 218 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 340.96 ha | 17,517 ha | 17,177 ha | China |
| 2000s | 27.04 ha | 5,371 ha | 5,344 ha | China |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 10.75 ha | 10.75 ha | China |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.31 ha | 4.31 ha | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, Bosnia and Herzegovina or China?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 ha against 0 ha in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
- 0 ha, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and China rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 44th and China ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.