Burkina Faso vs Estonia: Open shrubland — Burned Area
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Estonia
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
44th
Estonia rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Estonia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Estonia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 44th and Estonia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 130,412 ha | 1.36 ha | 130,411 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 29,797 ha | 0.15 ha | 29,797 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, Burkina Faso or Estonia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between Burkina Faso and Estonia?
- 0 ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Estonia rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 44th and Estonia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.