China, Hong Kong SAR vs Congo: Open shrubland — Burned Area
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 ha
in 2024
Congo
0 ha
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
44th
Congo rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Congo
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Congo, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 44th and Congo ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.73 ha | 6,474 ha | 6,468 ha | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 536.82 ha | 536.82 ha | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 4.27 ha | 4.27 ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, China, Hong Kong SAR or Congo?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between China, Hong Kong SAR and Congo?
- 0 ha, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Congo?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Congo rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 44th and Congo ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.