Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Open shrubland — Burned Area
Costa Rica
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
44th
New Zealand rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Costa Rica
- New Zealand
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 44th and New Zealand ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 59.64 ha | 0.783 ha | 58.86 ha | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, Costa Rica or New Zealand?
- Costa Rica, at 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 0 ha, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
- Costa Rica ranks 44th and New Zealand ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.