Kazakhstan vs Tunisia: Open shrubland — Burned Area
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
44th
Tunisia rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57,994 ha | 646.41 ha | 57,347 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4,520 ha | 63.07 ha | 4,457 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 75.29 ha | 1,518 ha | 1,442 ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 21.53 ha | 4,246 ha | 4,225 ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, Kazakhstan or Tunisia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between Kazakhstan and Tunisia?
- 0 ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tunisia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Tunisia rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.