Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Open shrubland — Burned Area

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1.10 million ha
in 2024
Russian Federation
1.02 million ha
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
7th
Russian Federation rank
4th

Open shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Russian Federation
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M199020072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 1.10 million ha against 1.02 million ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 79,240 ha.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 7th and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 31 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 3.87 million ha 907,726 ha 2.96 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 2.87 million ha 614,458 ha 2.26 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 3.11 million ha 497,774 ha 2.61 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 4.08 million ha 765,594 ha 3.31 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Russian Federation?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 1.10 million ha against 1.02 million ha in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation?
79,240 ha, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 7th and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/russian-federation-2/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Open shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Open shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.