New Zealand vs South Sudan: Open shrubland — Burned Area
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
South Sudan
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand rank
44th
South Sudan rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- New Zealand
- South Sudan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 44th and South Sudan ranks 44th of 218 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha | 24.04 ha | 24.04 ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, New Zealand or South Sudan?
- New Zealand, at 0 ha against 0 ha in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 0 ha, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and South Sudan rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
- New Zealand ranks 44th and South Sudan ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.