New Zealand vs Tunisia: Open shrubland — Burned Area
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand rank
44th
Tunisia rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- New Zealand
- Tunisia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.783 ha | 772.93 ha | 772.15 ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 63.07 ha | 63.07 ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 1,518 ha | 1,518 ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4,246 ha | 4,246 ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, New Zealand or Tunisia?
- New Zealand, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area between New Zealand and Tunisia?
- 0 ha, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Tunisia rank globally for open shrubland — burned area?
- New Zealand ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.