Chile vs Jordan: Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0 ha per person
in 2024
Jordan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
29th
Jordan rank
31st
Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Jordan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Jordan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 2.5 times Jordan's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 29th and Jordan ranks 31st of 185 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Chile or Jordan?
- Chile, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Chile and Jordan?
- 0 ha per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jordan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Jordan rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 29th and Jordan ranks 31st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.