Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Congo
0 ha per person
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
0 ha per person
in 2024
Congo rank
40th
Guinea-Bissau rank
40th
Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Congo
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 40th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0023 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0022 ha per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
- Congo, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0 ha per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Congo ranks 40th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.