Costa Rica vs Nicaragua: Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Costa Rica
0 ha per person
in 2024
Nicaragua
0 ha per person
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
40th
Nicaragua rank
40th
Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 40th and Nicaragua ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Costa Rica or Nicaragua?
- Costa Rica, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Costa Rica and Nicaragua?
- 0 ha per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Nicaragua?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Nicaragua rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 40th and Nicaragua ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.