Costa Rica vs Palestine: Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Costa Rica
0 ha per person
in 2024
Palestine
0 ha per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
40th
Palestine rank
40th
Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Palestine
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Palestine, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 40th and Palestine ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Palestine |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Palestine |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Palestine |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Costa Rica or Palestine?
- Costa Rica, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Palestine as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Costa Rica and Palestine?
- 0 ha per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Palestine?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Palestine rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 40th and Palestine ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.