Egypt vs Mongolia: Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Egypt
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mongolia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
38th
Mongolia rank
40th
Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Mongolia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mongolia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Egypt ranks 38th and Mongolia ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0082 ha per person | 0.0082 ha per person | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Egypt or Mongolia?
- Egypt, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Egypt and Mongolia?
- 0 ha per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mongolia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Mongolia rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 38th and Mongolia ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.