Rwanda vs Tajikistan: Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Rwanda
0 ha per person
in 2024
Tajikistan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
40th
Tajikistan rank
40th
Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 40th and Tajikistan ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Rwanda or Tajikistan?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Rwanda and Tajikistan?
- 0 ha per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tajikistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Tajikistan rank globally for open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 40th and Tajikistan ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.