China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Republic of Tanzania: Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
United Republic of Tanzania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
44th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
44th
Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 44th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 44th of 149 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -16.67 % change on previous year | 47.43 % change on previous year | 64.09 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -55.48 % change on previous year | 44.52 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or United Republic of Tanzania?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2000.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 44th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 44th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.