Ecuador vs Latvia: Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Ecuador
-100 % change on previous year
in 2002
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Ecuador rank
44th
Latvia rank
44th
Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 149 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Ecuador or Latvia?
- Ecuador, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2002.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.