Fiji vs Namibia: Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Fiji
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Namibia
-92.89 % change on previous year
in 2024
Fiji rank
44th
Namibia rank
43rd
Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Fiji
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports -92.89 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Fiji, a difference of 7.11 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 43rd of 149 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Fiji or Namibia?
- Namibia, at -92.89 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Fiji and Namibia?
- 7.11 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Fiji and Namibia rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Fiji ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 43rd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.