Guatemala vs Latvia: Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Guatemala
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Guatemala rank
44th
Latvia rank
44th
Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Guatemala
- Latvia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 149 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Guatemala or Latvia?
- Guatemala, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Guatemala and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Guatemala and Latvia rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Guatemala ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.