Iceland vs Panama: Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Panama
-100 % change on previous year
in 1998
Iceland rank
44th
Panama rank
44th
Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Iceland
- Panama
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Panama, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Panama ahead.
Iceland ranks 44th and Panama ranks 44th of 149 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Iceland or Panama?
- Iceland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Panama as of 2001.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Iceland and Panama?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Panama?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1998.
- How do Iceland and Panama rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Iceland ranks 44th and Panama ranks 44th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.