Latvia vs Panama: Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Panama
-100 % change on previous year
in 1998
Latvia rank
44th
Panama rank
44th
Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Latvia
- Panama
How they compare
Latvia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Panama, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Panama ahead.
Latvia ranks 44th and Panama ranks 44th of 149 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Latvia or Panama?
- Latvia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Panama as of 2000.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Latvia and Panama?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1998.
- How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Latvia ranks 44th and Panama ranks 44th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.