Nicaragua vs Sri Lanka: Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Nicaragua
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Nicaragua rank
44th
Sri Lanka rank
44th
Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Nicaragua
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 44th and Sri Lanka ranks 44th of 149 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Nicaragua or Sri Lanka?
- Nicaragua, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2001.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Nicaragua and Sri Lanka?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sri Lanka?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Nicaragua and Sri Lanka rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Nicaragua ranks 44th and Sri Lanka ranks 44th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.